Slippery slopes... another derivative
Excerpt: This resource discusses how the derivatives of functions like can be obtained by viewing them as translations of functions that we already know how to differentiate. This could precede work on the chain rule.
Problem
You might find some of the ideas in Slippery slopes helpful when thinking about this problem.
Here are the graphs of and with tangents drawn at points A and B.
What happens when you move the point A? (Be careful when the -coordinate of A gets close to .)
[interactive embed (geogebra-iframe): //www.geogebratube.org/material/iframe/id/ePU8jFwR/width/600/height/396/border/888888/rc/false/ai/false/sdz/false/smb/false/stb/false/stbh/false/ld/false/sri/true/asb/false/at/html5] — not part of the text import; see the source page.
Download GeoGebra file
- How could you work out the gradient of at the point ?
- How can you differentiate ?
- How could you adapt these approaches to work out the derivative of ?
Suggestion for part 1
The graph of is a translation of the graph of .
Suggestion for part 2
Can you generalise ideas from part 1 to find the derivative of at a general point ?
Suggestion for part 3
We already know how to differentiate constant multiples of powers of , so we know how to differentiate .
Can you suggest other examples where you could use a similar approach to find derivatives?
In this problem we have only composed the function with functions of the form . Could you apply any of these ideas to polynomial, rational or trigonometric functions?
Solution
There are several ways to find the gradient function or derivative of The approaches we discuss here assume that you do not already know how to differentiate this function directly.
The graph of is a translation
Therefore the tangent to at is parallel to the tangent to at
It follows that the gradient of where is the same as the gradient of where
Therefore the gradient of at is
Now consider a general point on the graph of
From the ideas in part 1, the gradient of at a general point is the same as the gradient of at the point with coordinates .
You can see this by moving the point A in the GeoGebra file above.
Therefore the derivative of is
What would happen if the function we wanted to differentiate had been a translation of parallel to the -axis instead?
We already know how to differentiate constant multiples of powers of , so we know how to differentiate . From the first part of the problem we also know a way of finding the derivatives of horizontal translations of functions. What is as a translation of ?
The vertical asymptotes of the two graphs suggest that is a translation of by in the negative -direction.
Function notation can help to show this too.
If we write then
This means that the gradient of at is the same as the gradient of at .
You can see this by moving the point A in the GeoGebra file below. Be careful when the -coordinate of A gets close to .
[interactive embed (geogebra-iframe): //www.geogebratube.org/material/iframe/id/RExfGrf4/width/624/height/407/border/888888/rc/false/ai/false/sdz/false/smb/false/stb/false/stbh/false/ld/false/sri/true/asb/false/at/html5] — not part of the text import; see the source page.
Download GeoGebra file
It follows that the gradient of at is
We can write this as to help see the relationship between the original function and its derivative.
You could also think of as a transformation of How would this affect your approach?