Irrational roots
Excerpt: This problem offers students the opportunity to think about the solutions to quadratic equations in a more challenging context. Students are given an irrational root and work backwards to find the original quadratic polynomial.
Problem
The roots of quadratic polynomials can be nice, integer values. For example has as a root. However, this is not always the case. You will have encountered many quadratic polynomials with roots that are fractions or even irrational numbers.
Convince yourself that is a root of the quadratic equation and that is a root of the quadratic equation .
- Can you find a quadratic polynomial with integer coefficients which has as a root? What is the other root of this polynomial?
- What if instead is a root? What would the quadratic polynomial be now? What would the other root be this time?
- Can you generalise your answers to the case where is a root? What about the case where is a root?
If you think you need to revisit methods of solving quadratic equations you may like to look at these resources: Quadratic grids and Factorisable quadratics.
Suggestion
I know that the quadratic factorises as times something. So perhaps I could write the quadratic as and work out what and could be.
Alternatively, perhaps I could think about the relation between and , and see where that leads me to if I start with instead.
As a third possible approach, I could think about the graph of , which has as a solution, and wonder what I would have to do to get as a solution instead.
As a fourth approach, since involves square roots, I could try squaring it to get . Can I somehow use this together with to get rid of the part?
Solution
Approach 1
We can approach this problem by thinking about the factorised form of the quadratic polynomial. If is a root then we can factorise the original quadratic as .
If we expand the factorised form we get
Now, we know that we are looking for a quadratic with integer coefficients so we know that the constant term, must be an integer, say . If , then We can rationalise the denominator by multiplying by to get
We are making use of the difference of two squares here.
This gives us a constant term of .
We also require that the coefficient of , is an integer. Substituting our value for in here gives .
For this to be an integer we require that so that the surds cancel
So we have a quadratic polynomial of the form or equivalently, . In the simplest case this is .
The other root of the polynomial will be .
Approach 2
When we think about the first example, , we see that it is just squared and then rearranged.
So if we start with , we could just square it, but then we get , which hasn’t really helped us.
But if we rearrange it first to get the square root alone on one side, we have This can now be squared to get which does the job: expanding the brackets gives , so has as a root.
Working backwards, we see that gives , so the other root is .
Approach 3
When we think about the graph of , a parabola, we see that it has a root at and another one at . As we want to have a root at , we can translate this parabola unit to the right so that it now has a root at . This can be achieved if we remember that corresponds to a horizontal translation to the right. In this case, we begin with so that .
Therefore a quadratic polynomial with as a root is , as with the other two approaches.
The second root of is , as the second root of the original polynomial is also translated unit to the right.
The second root could also have been found using the quadratic formula.
Approach 4
We have . When we square this, we get . This might remind us of one method of solving simultaneous equations, where we eliminate variables one at a time.
In this case, if we subtract from , we’ll eliminate the : so , and we have our required polynomial.
We can now find the other root of this quadratic by any standard technique, though it is not clear from this approach what the other root will be.
Which of these four approaches do you prefer?
Which of these four approaches can be most easily adapted to other situations?
What if instead is a root? How would the quadratic polynomial look now? What would the other root be this time?
This is a very similar question to that above. It makes sense that we can use the same approaches.
They all give the answer , and the other root is .
Think about how the solutions to the first two questions could inform your answer here. Perhaps think about some other particular cases if you are unsure.
Taking it further
- Can you find a polynomial (not necessarily a quadratic) with integer coefficients which has as a root? What other roots (if any) does it have?
- Can you find a polynomial with integer coefficients which has as a root? What other roots (if any) does it have?
- Can you find a polynomial with integer coefficients which has as a root? What other roots (if any) does it have?
- Can you make up some similar questions to the above? Are there any numbers for which you cannot find a polynomial with integer coefficients which has that number as a root?