Can we solve log3x+2logx3=−3?
Question
- If a, b and c are any positive numbers not equal to unity, show that
logbalogcblogac=1.
- Find the values of x which satisfy the equation
log3x+2logx3=−3.
Suggestion
How can we rewrite the equation logab=c in a way that does not include logarithms?
Solution
Approach 1: Rewriting logarithms as exponentials
Let logba=x, logcb=y, and logac=z so that, by definition, bx=a, cy=b, and az=c.
Thus a=bx=(cy)x=cxy=(az)xy=axyz, which implies that xyz=1, that is, logbalogcblogac=1.
Approach 2: Changing the base of logarithms
If logab=c, then ac=b. If we now take logs to base d=1, then logd(ac)=logdb⟹clogda=logdb.
So we have c=logab=logdalogdb, and thus we can find logs to base a if we know logs to base d=1.
This means logablogbclogca=logdalogdblogdblogdclogdclogda=1, as required.
The numbers a, b and c cannot be 1 since `logs to base 1’ makes no sense.
Can this result be generalised beyond three variables?
Approach 1: Rewriting logarithms as exponentials
Let log3x=y and logx3=z, so that 3y=x and xz=3. Thus 3=xz=(3y)z=3yz, which implies that yz=1.
We also have y+2z=−3. Solving these two equations simultaneously gives (−2z−3)z=1⟹2z2+3z+1=0⟹(2z+1)(z+1)=0.
Thus z=−21 or −1, and hence x=31 or 91.
Approach 2: Changing the base of logarithms
From our work on changing bases above, we have logab=logbalogbb=logba1.
Thus we have
log3x+2logx3=−3⟺log3x+log3x2=−3.
If we take
u=log3x=0
, this equation is equivalent to
u+u2=−3⟺u2+3u+2=0⟺(u+2)(u+1)=0⟺u=−1oru=−2⟺log3x=−1orlog3x=−2⟺x=31orx=91.