Summing to one
Excerpt: This task explores the behaviour of logarithms to different bases, by asking for solutions to equations in which sums of logarithms are equal to one.
Problem 1
log33=1
log93+log93=1
log273+⋯+log273=1
How many log813 do you need to add together to make one?
Solution 1
log33=1
log93+log93=1
log273+⋯+log273=1
Perhaps some logical first thoughts would be that the second equation, log93+log93=1, can be rewritten as 2log93=1, and so log93=21.
We now have that log33=1 and that log93=21 but what is log273?
Remember that we also know that log33=1 because 31=3, and that log93=21 because 921=3.
This is because of one of the defining statements about logarithms: logax=y means x=ay for real numbers x>0 and y.
We can now ask the question, to what power do we raise 27 to get the result 3? If we think about powers of 3 then we can quickly confirm that 27=33 and so 2731=3.
Now we have that log273=31 and therefore log273+log273+log273=1, or equivalently, log273+2log273=1, or log273+log279=1.
An alternative approach would be to use the statement logxab=logxa+logxb. We can use this to rewrite the second equation, log93+log93=1, as log9(3×3)=log99=1.
Knowing that logxx=1 we can now think of the third equation as
log27(3a)=1 where 3a=27 and therefore a=9 as before, log273+log279=1.
How many log813 do you need to add together to make one?
We can use exactly the same thinking to address this problem. We could consider 81n=3 and recognise that 81=34 so n=41.
This tells us that we will need four lots of log813 to make one, 4log813=1.
This thinking relies on us recognising, or quickly deducing that 81 is the fourth power of 3. If the base of the logarithm were something less familiar, for instance 2187 (the seventh power of 3), then this method is less convenient.
Alternatively we could have used the laws of logs to conclude that log813+log81b=log81(3b)=1 and so 3b=81 and hence b=27.
Then we have log813+log8127=1. But, remember that the question asks how many lots of log813 we need so we need to make one. This means that we need to write log8127 in terms of log813.
To do this we should first recognise that 27=33 so we can write that log8127=log8133=3log813.
We have used the statement logaxy=ylogax.
Now we have log813+log8127=log813+3log813, and therefore 4log813=1.
Problem 2
Can we choose integers x and y so that:
log6x+log6y=1?
How many different ways are there to do this?
How about using log12?
How about using log24?
How might your answers change if the equations were instead of the form lognx−logny=1?
Solution 2
If we use the statement logxab=logxa+logxb we can rewrite the equation, log6x+log6y=1, as log6(x×y)=1.
Knowing that logxx=1 we can see that in the equation above x×y=6.
Six has two pairs of factors: 1×6 and 2×3, so there are two possible ways to choose integers x and y so that log6x+log6y=1:
log61+log66=1 and log62+log63=1.
Why did we not consider pairs of integers x and y such as −1×−6?
In theory, if we thought about evaluating each term in the equation we might try to choose a value of x that is a power of 6. We might choose something like x=36 so that log636=2.
What is the problem that we would encounter if we tried this approach?
What further information does this give us about the values of x and y?
How about using log12?
Taking the same approach as above we have that log12x+log12y=log12(x×y)=1.
By the same reasoning as the previous example we can conclude that x×y=12 and as 12 has three pairs of factors there will be three possible ways to choose integers x and y so that log12x+log12y=1:
log121+log1212=1,
or
log122+log126=1,
or
log123+log124=1.
How about using log24?
24 has four pairs of factors so there will be four possible ways to choose integers x and y so that log24x+log24y=1:
log241+log2424=1, log242+log2412=1, log243+log248=1,
and
log244+log246=1.
In all of the examples above we have only considered positive values of x and y. Why?