Stretching an integral
Excerpt: How can we integrate ? Students are asked what happens to areas under the graph of when it is stretched, leading to a formula for the integral without requiring calculus tools.
Warm-up
The graph of the function is stretched as shown in this diagram.
If the graph is stretched by a factor of in the -direction (as shown), what is the equation of the resulting graph?
And if, instead, the original graph is stretched by a factor of in the -direction, what is the equation of the resulting graph?
Warm-up solution
The graph of the function is stretched as shown in this diagram.
If the graph is stretched by a factor of in the -direction (as shown), what is the equation of the resulting graph?
One way to think about this problem is to use the language of functions.
The original graph has equation , where .
When we stretch the graph by a factor of in the -direction, a point with coordinates is stretched to the point with coordinates , as shown in the following diagram. If we write for the new -coordinate, then the new point has coordinates , so the new graph has equation , or using lower-case letters.
So the equation of the stretched graph is . Multiplying the numerator and denominator by gives the simpler form .
And if, instead, the original graph is stretched by a factor of in the -direction, what is the equation of the resulting graph?
This time, the point is stretched to the point with coordinates , as shown in the following diagram. Writing the coordinates of the new point again as , we find the new graph has equation , as , or using lower-case letters.
Therefore the equation of the stretched graph is .
Problem
Take a look at these diagrams. (There is a printable version of them available.)
Diagram 1 shows the graph of . is the shaded region under the graph between and , where , so .
Step 1: The shaded region in Diagram 4 has the same area as the shaded region in Diagram 1 () after undergoing two stretches (either via Diagram 2 or via Diagram 3). Fill in the following information on each diagram where it is missing:
-
the scale factor that was used in the stretch;
-
the -coordinate at each end of the shaded region;
-
the area of the shaded region in terms of , and
-
the equation of the graph.
Interactive applet
In the following applet, you can:
-
choose the value of
-
stretch the graph (and the shaded region with it) in the -direction by a scale factor of
-
stretch the graph (and the shaded region with it) in the -direction by a scale factor of
The original area is shown, and the area of the stretched shaded region is also shown.
The original (unstretched) graph of is shown as a dashed red line.
[interactive embed (geogebra-iframe): //www.geogebratube.org/material/iframe/id/xa8hvBNg/width/584/height/398/border/888888/rc/false/ai/false/sdz/false/smb/false/stb/false/stbh/false/ld/false/sri/true/asb/false/at/html5] — not part of the text import; see the source page.
Download GeoGebra file
Step 2: Investigating the function .
Recall from above that is the function that gives the area of the shaded region between and under the graph of , so . (To avoid confusion, we have used when writing this integral instead of , since appears in the limits.)
-
Looking now at Diagram 4, can you identify the area on the diagram?
-
Are there any other values which you can easily identify on the diagram?
-
How are and related?
What do these answers suggest about the function ? Have you seen anything with these properties before?
Some further questions
-
Using this applet or some graphing software, investigate values of . Which value of gives ? What does this tell you? > [interactive embed (geogebra-iframe): //www.geogebratube.org/material/iframe/id/RTkHVBpq/width/577/height/396/border/888888/rc/false/ai/false/sdz/false/smb/false/stb/false/stbh/false/ld/false/sri/true/asb/false/at/html5] — not part of the text import; see the source page. Download GeoGebra file
-
What happens if one or both of and are less than ?
Solution
Take a look at these diagrams.
Diagram 1 shows the graph of . is the shaded region under the graph between and , where , so .
Step 1: The shaded region in Diagram 4 has the same area as the shaded region in Diagram 1 () after undergoing two stretches (either via Diagram 2 or via Diagram 3). Fill in the following information on each diagram where it is missing:
-
the scale factor that was used in the stretch;
-
the -coordinate at each end of the shaded region;
-
the area of the shaded region in terms of , and
-
the equation of the graph.
Using the ideas from the Warm-up problem, we can complete the diagrams as follows:
Step 2: Investigating the function .
-
Looking now at Diagram 4, can you identify the area on the diagram?
-
Are there any other values which you can easily identify on the diagram?
-
How are and related?
Recall that is the area under the graph between and , which we can see fits on the diagram very easily, giving the following:
The other value which is now easy to identify on the diagram is the whole shaded area from to , which is .
Putting these together, we see that
In terms of integrals, this says that which is far from obvious from the above sketch.
This suggests that may be a logarithm, because logarithms also have the property that
Some further questions
Experiment shows that when . Therefore if really is a logarithm, the base of the logarithm is approximately .
We can actually use this result to define logarithms: we define the natural logarithm of , usually written , to be , so
The base of these logarithms is called “”, so we have discovered that . Therefore, the natural logarithm can also be written as .
If you have already met the natural logarithm function, how can you check that the definition given here and your existing definition agree?
- What happens if and/or is less than ?
The relationship we have discovered, does still work, but we have to require that if , then is considered to be negative. This fits with the integral definition of , that is . Then if , the limits of the integral are in the “wrong order”, so we take the value of the integral to be (with the limits in the “right order”), and this is negative. This is because we always require
Why might we require integrals to behave in this way?