Can we prove the Arithmetic and Geometric Mean Inequality?
Question
Prove that, if a and b are real, 21(a2+b2)≥ab.
Deduce that, if a,b and c are real, a2+b2+c2≥ab+bc+ca.
Show that a+b+c is a factor of a3+b3+c3−3abc and find the other factor of this expression.
Deduce that, if p, q and r are positive, 31(p+q+r)≥(pqr)31.
Suggestion
What happens if we bring everything to the left-hand side and try to factorise?
Can we use the first part of the question here?
Could we use earlier parts to help? Would putting p=a3,q=b3,r=c3 be more convenient?
Solution
The inequality holds if and only if a2+b2≥2ab, which is true if and only if a2−2ab+b2≥0.
This is true, since a2−2ab+b2=(a−b)2, and any square is either zero or positive. Hence 21(a2+b2)≥ab.
This is called the arithmetic mean-geometric mean inequality, or the AM-GM inequality, for two variables.
The quantity 21(x+y) is the arithmetic mean of x and y, and (if x and y are positive) xy is the geometric mean of x and y.
So we have established that the arithmetic mean is always greater than or equal to the geometric mean.
This inequality is extremely useful for solving many mathematics problems.
We can use the result in (i) three times for
a
and
b
,
b
and
c
and
c
and
a
, namely
21(a2+b2)21(b2+c2)21(c2+a2)≥ab,≥bc,≥ca.
By adding them up we get 21(a2+b2)+21(b2+c2)+21(c2+a2)≥ab+bc+ca, which implies a2+b2+c2≥ab+bc+ca.
We can use the Factor Theorem here.
The Factor Theorem says that the polynomial f(x) has a factor x−p if and only if f(p)=0.
Let’s put f(a)=a3+b3+c3−3abc, so f(a) is a degree 3 polynomial in a. Thus a+b+c will be a factor of f(a) if and only if f(−b−c)=0.
Now f(−b−c)=(−b−c)3+b3+c3−3(−b−c)bc=−b3−3b2c−3bc2−c3+b3+c3+3bc+3c2b=0.
So a+b+c does divide a3+b3+c3−3abc.
We need the other factor, which must include a2+b2+c2, because we need to create a3+b3+c3.
Let’s say that (a+b+c)(a2+b2+c2+g)=a3+b3+c3−3abc, where g is a polynomial in a,b and c.
So a3+b3+c3+ab2+ac2+ba2+ca2+cb2+(a+b+c)g=a3+b3+c3−3abc ,
which is true if and only if
ab2+ac2+ba2+ca2+cb2+3abc+(a+b+c)g=0, or (ab+bc+ca)(a+b+c)+(a+b+c)g=0.
So g=−(ab+bc+ca), and a3+b3+c3−3abc=(a+b+c)(a2+b2+c2+−ab−bc−ca).
Let a=p31, b=q31 and c=r31.
Then in terms of a, b and c, we have to prove that a3+b3+c3≥3abc.
By (iii) we know that a3+b3+c3−3abc=(a+b+c)(a2+b2+c2−ab−bc−ca) and this is greater or equal to 0 since, by (ii), a2+b2+c2−ab−bc−ca≥0, and a+b+c≥0, as a, b and c are positive.
Therefore, a3+b3+c3−3abc≥0, which implies a3+b3+c3≥3abc.
Hence, 31(p+q+r)≥(pqr)31.
This is the arithmetic mean-geometric mean (AM-GM) inequality for three variables: again, the arithmetic mean is always greater than or equal to the geometric mean.
What happens if we try to generalise to more variables?