Can we solve the equation log2x+log3x=1+log4x?
Question
- If a, b, c are positive and are the pth, qth, rth terms of a geometric progression prove that
(q−r)loga+(r−p)logb+(p−q)logc=0.
- Solve the equation log2x+log3x=1+log4x, giving your answer to three significant figures.
Suggestion
Typically, we’d use a for the first term of the geometric progression and r for the common ratio, but that would be bad here, as a and r have already been used in the question…
What are the pth, qth and rth terms of the geometric progression, anyway?
Also note that the question does not specify the base of the logarithms, so presumably this should be true for any base.
Hmm, all of these logs have different bases. That seems very awkward. What can we do to simplify things?
Solution
If the geometric progression has first term
A
and common ratio
R
, then
abc=ARp−1,=ARq−1,=ARr−1,
where
A=0
. By taking logarithms (to whichever base we like), we have
logalogblogc=logA+(p−1)logR,=logA+(q−1)logR,=logA+(r−1)logR.
Consequently, we can just do lots of algebra to show that the result is true:
(q−r)loga+(r−p)logb+(p−q)logc=((q−r)+(r−p)+(p−q))logA+((q−r)(p−1)+(r−p)(q−1)+(p−q)(r−1))logR=(qp−rp−q+r+rq−pq−r+p+pr−qr−p+q)logR=0.
This argument is unenlightening; it gives no idea of why the result should be true. Another way of thinking about it is to observe that
ab=Rq−pandac=Rr−p.
If we now raise the first of these equations to the power of r−p and the second to the power of q−p, we find that (ab)r−p=(ac)q−p.
Now taking logs gives (r−p)(logb−loga)=(q−p)(logc−loga), and rearranging this gives us the required identity.
Let’s rewrite the logarithms, so that they’re all to the same base. We use the change of base formula to do this. (There is more on this topic in Changing bases.) We may as well use base 10 for our logarithms, so we have logax=log10alog10x.
Our equation then becomes log102log10x+log103log10x=1+log104log10x. This is now a linear equation in log10x, so we can simply rearrange it to solve it: (log1021+log1031−log1041)log10x=1 so that log10x=1/(log1021+log1031−log1041)≈0.266179 Exponentiating both sides with base 10 gives x≈100.266179≈1.85 to 3 significant figures.
Alternatively, we can say, let log2x=a, log3x=b, log4x=c, so the equation becomes, a+b=1+c.
Now log4x=c implies 4c=x=2a, and as 4c=22c, we have a=2c. Thus the equation simplifies to b+c=1.
We have x=3b=4c and b=1−c, so 31−c=4c. Taking logarithms of both sides (to a base of our choice) gives (1−c)log3=clog4, and so c=log4+log3log3. (A particularly nice base to pick is 3, in which case this simplifies to log34+11.)
Thus x=4c=4log3/(log4+log3)=1.85 to 3 significant figures.