Can we show (rn)=(r−1n−1)+(r−1n−2)+(r−1n−3)+…b+(r−1r−1)?
Question
- Prove that ∑r=0n(rn)=2n.
- By considering the number of ways of choosing a set of n people from a set of 2n people, or otherwise, prove that (n2n)=(0n)2+(1n)2+…b+(nn)2.
- Prove that (rn)=(r−1n−1)+(rn−1) and hence, or otherwise, prove that (rn)=(r−1n−1)+(r−1n−2)+(r−1n−3)+…b+(r−1r−1), where r, n are positive integers with 1≤r≤n−1.
Suggestion
What does the binomial theorem give as the value of (a+b)n? What about (1+a)n?
Could we split our group of people into two groups of size n?
If we take 1 person from the first group, how many people do you have to take from the second to choose n people overall?
What if we take r people from the first group?
Could we write down the two factorial representations of (r−1n−1) and (rn−1)?
Or could we imagine a bag of n objects, and picking r from it?
[...] and hence, or otherwise, prove that (rn)=(r−1n−1)+(r−1n−2)+(r−1n−3)+…b+(r−1r−1), where r, n are positive integers with 1≤r≤n−1.
We’ve just found an expression for (rn) — how is this useful?
Solution
Using the expression for the binomial theorem:
(a+b)n=r=0∑n(rn)anbn−r,
if we set a=b=1 then
(1+1)n=2n=r=0∑n(rn)1n1n−r=r=0∑n(rn),
as required.
The expression
(rn)=r!(n−r)!n!
gives the number of ways of choosing r objects from a set of n objects, without replacement.
If we want to choose n objects from 2n objects, one way of doing this is to line up the 2n objects and simply pick n objects from them.
The number of ways of doing this is then (n2n).
Alternatively we could split the 2n objects into two equal groups of n objects, then choose r objects from the first group and n−r from the second.
Summing over all the possible values of r={0,1,2,…b,n} will give the total number of ways of doing this as ∑r=0n(rn)(n−rn).
But we know by symmetry that (rn)=(n−rn), and so we have (n2n)=∑r=0n(rn)2.
There are (rn) ways of choosing r people from n people.
If we now consider one specific person from among the n people, say James, our set of r people might include James or not.
If James is included, then there are (r−1n−1) ways of choosing the other r−1 people from the remaining n−1 people.
If James is excluded, then there are (rn−1) ways of choosing the r people from the remaining n−1 people.
So there are (r−1n−1)+(rn−1) ways in total of choosing r people, hence
(r−1n−1)+(rn−1)=(rn).
Alternatively, we could start with the right hand side of the given expression. We have
(r−1n−1)+(rn−1)=(r−1)!(n−r)!(n−1)!+r!(n−r−1)!(n−1)!=r(r−1)!(n−r)!r(n−1)!+r!(n−r)(n−r−1)!(n−r)(n−1)!=r!(n−r)!r(n−1)!+r!(n−r)!(n−r)(n−1)!=r!(n−r)!r(n−1)!+(n−r)(n−1)!=r!(n−r)!n(n−1)!=r!(n−r)!n!=(rn).
[...] and hence, or otherwise, prove that (rn)=(r−1n−1)+(r−1n−2)+(r−1n−3)+…b+(r−1r−1), where r, n are positive integers with 1≤r≤n−1.
Using the formula above repeatedly, we find
(rn)=(r−1n−1)+(rn−1)=(r−1n−1)+[(r−1n−2)+(rn−2)]etc.
We can see that as this builds up we always have
(rn−a)
as the last term, but we want to end with
(r−1r−1)
. If we note that
(rr)=(r−1r−1)=1
then we know to continue until
n−a=r
so
a=n−r
.
(rn)=(r−1n−1)+(r−1n−2)+…b+[(r−1n−(n−r))+(rn−(n−r))]=(r−1n−1)+(r−1n−2)+…b+(r−1r)+(rr)=(r−1n−1)+(r−1n−2)+…b+(r−1r)+(r−1r−1)