Excerpt: In this resource students explore how logarithms of different bases are related. A set of graphical problems are presented, based on a graph of log5x, and a set of algebraic problems.
Warm-up
For any positive number x, can you explain why this result is true?
2log4x=log2x
Can you describe what log4x and log2x are in words?
Suggestion
log4x is the power that we’d need to raise 4 to if we wanted to get x, and log2x is the power that we’d need to raise 2 to if we wanted to get x.
Which of the following is correct?
2log6x=log3x3log9x=log3x2log9x=log3x
Test your answer
Thinking about how logarithms are defined, the equation 2log4x=log2x seems to hold because 4 is 22, rather than because 4 is 2 ‘doubled’. Therefore of the three alternatives, 2log9x=log3x is likely to be the equivalent result, but for base 3 and 9. To check this, let log9x=k. Then x=9k, so log3x=log39k=log332k=2k=2log9x.
What is a general statement of this result?
Suggestion
There are various relationships here that we can start to generalise.
How is logax related to loga2x ?
How is logax related to loganx?
How is logax related to logbx? How can we express the relationship between a and b?
Test your answer
From the examples above, we can see that logax=2loga2x, which we could generalise to logax=nloganx. Thinking about n’s role in this equation brings us to
logax=(logab)(logbx) or equivalently logbx=logablogax.
What conditions must x,a,b satisfy here? Could the second of these ever risk division by 0?
Some graphical problems
Here is a graph of y=log5x
Use this graph of y=log5x to help you to draw graphs of
log25x
log5x
log51x
log10x
logx5
Try to make your graphs as accurate as you can, but use the graph of y=log5x to help you, rather than a calculator.
You could try to sketch the graphs first, thinking about which points the graphs go through and which graphs will give larger or smaller values for the same value of x. You may find it helpful to look back at the warm-up.
You can draw your graphs on the printable larger version of the y=log5x graph.
Graph solutions
Here are graphs 1 and 2 drawn using values from the y=log5x. The relationships between each graph and the graph of y=log5x are described below.
log25x=(log255)(log5x)=21log5x, so the graph of y=log25x is a stretch of the graph y=log5x parallel to the y-axis and scale factor 21.
log5x=(log55)(log5x)=2log5x, so the graph of y=log5x is a stretch of the graph y=log5x parallel to the y-axis and scale factor 2.
Thinking about the definition of logarithms, as we did in the warm-up, these results make sense. For example, we’d expect the power that we’d raise 5 to in order to get a given value of x to be twice as much as the power we’d need to raise 25 to.
As 51=5−1, the power that we’d raise 51 to in order to get a given value of x is −1 times the power we’d need to raise 5 to. Alternatively, using the idea from the warm-up, log51x=(log515)(log5x)=−log5x and so the graph of y=log51x is a reflection in the x-axis of the graph of y=log5x.
More work is needed for the graph of y=log10x. We know that log10x=log510log5x, so we need to divide by log510 to get the graph of y=log10x. The given graph doesn’t go up as far as x=10, but log510=log55+log52=1+log52. From the graph, log52≈0.42. Now, 1÷1.42=142100=7150≈7049=0.7 so the graph of y=log10x is a stretch of y=log5x parallel to the y-axis, scale factor 0.7.
For x>0 with x=1, (log5x)(logx5)=log55=1, so logx5 is the reciprocal of y=log5x. We can use this to plot particular points to get an idea of the shape of the graph y=logx5.
Alternatively, we can use the behaviour of the function log5x to sketch the behaviour. For x>1, as x increases, log5x increases and is positive, so logx5 decreases and is positive. For x close to 1, log5x is close to 0, and the graph of y=logx5 has an asymptote at x=1. For 0<x<1, log5x is negative. It increases to 0 as x increases to 1, and tends to −∞ as x decreases to 0. The graph of y=logx5 gets steeper and closer to the y-axis as x decreases to 0, but it doesn’t actually meet the y-axis because logx5 isn’t defined for x=0.
Some algebraic problems
Evaluate the following. Can you do this without calculating each factor separately? (log39)(log981)(log381)(log819)
Write the following as a single logarithm. What conditions must x and y satisfy? (log105)(log5x)(log10x)(logxy)(logy3)
Simplify the following. What conditions must x and y satisfy? (logxy)(logy10)(log8x)(logxy)(log8x)(logy8)
The value of log23 is approximately 1.6. Can you use this to approximate log427? What about log827? Can you generalise this result?
Evaluate log225log25log103log105
Given that logxy=4 and logy2=9, evaluate (logx2)(logyx)logyxlogx2
What is (logab3)(logba3)?
What is the relationship between logab and logba?
Solve logx7=log7x.
Algebra solutions
Evaluate the following. Can you do this without calculating each factor separately? (log39)(log981)(log381)(log819)
Using the generalised version of the result in the warm-up,
(log39)(log981)=log381=4
(log381)(log819)=log39=2.
Write the following as a single logarithm. What conditions must x and y satisfy? (log105)(log5x)(log10x)(logxy)(logy3)
Using the same idea as in question 1, (a) (log105)(log5x)=log10x.
Again, since x and y both occur as bases of logarithms in these expressions, x and y must both be positive, but can’t be 1.
The value of log23 is approximately 1.6. Can you use this to approximate log427? What about log827?
If we start by using the law for manipulating logs of powers, we get log427=3log43.
From the definition of logarithms, we know that log43 is smaller than log23, so we can expect the answer to be less than 4.8. In fact, we can say more than this, because log43<1<log23, so we should expect the answer to be less than 3.
From the warm-up we know that log43=21log23. Therefore log427=3(log42)(log23)≈3×21×1.6=2.4.
We know that log827 will be smaller than log427. By manipulating powers and changing the base, we get log827=3(log82)(log23)=log23≈1.6.
Note that from the second part we have log2333=log23. In general, logakbk=logab for any positive a, b with a=1 and any power k. How could you prove this?
Evaluate log225log25log103log105
log225log25=(log25)(log525)log25=21
log103log105=log103(log103)(log35)=log35
Alternatively, we could use the fraction form of the general result in the warm-up.
Given that logxy=4 and logy2=9, evaluate (logx2)(logyx)logyxlogx2
(logx2)(logyx)=(logyx)(logx2)=logy2=9.
Using ideas from question 5, or the two forms for changing base given in the warm-up, the numerator can be rewritten as (logxy)(logy2) and the denominator as logxylogxx.
Using laws for manipulating logs of powers, (logab3)(logba3)=9(logab)(logba)=9logaa=9.
What is the relationship between logab and logba?
In questions 3 and 7 we had something of the form (logab)(logba)=logaa, so (logab)(logba)=1, or equivalently logab=logba1. Is there any danger of dividing by 0 here?
Solve logx7=log7x.
Using the relationship in question 8, solving logx7=log7x is equivalent to solving (log7x)2=1. Therefore we need to solve log7x=1 and log7x=−1, which give us x=7 and x=71 as solutions.